Critical samba bug lurking in your system

 

 

Critical samba bug lurking in your system CVE-2021-44141 and CVE-2022-0336

Understanding SMB

SMB - Server Message Block Protocol - is a client-server communication protocol used for sharing access to files, printers, serial ports and other resources on a network. [source] Learn about, then enumerate and exploit a variety of network services and misconfigurations.
 
Servers make file systems and other resources (printers, named pipes, APIs) available to clients on the network. Client computers may have their own hard disks, but they also want access to the shared file systems and printers on the servers. The SMB protocol is known as a response-request protocol, meaning that it transmits multiple messages between the client and server to establish a connection. Clients connect to servers using TCP/IP (actually NetBIOS over TCP/IP as specified in RFC1001 and RFC1002), NetBEUI or IPX/SPX.

How does SMB work?

Once they have established a connection, clients can then send commands (SMBs) to the server that allow them to access shares, open files, read and write files, and generally do all the sort of things that you want to do with a file system. However, in the case of SMB, these things are done over the network.

 

Also read- All about SMB and enum4linux with Questions/Answer

 

Also read- Samba and exploitation too

Samba Active Directory

The Samba AD DC includes checks when adding service principals names (SPNs) to an account to ensure that SPNs do not alias with those already in the database. Some of these checks are able to be bypassed if an account modification re-adds an SPN that was previously present
on that account, such as one added when a computer is joined to a domain. An attacker who has the ability to write to an account can exploit
this to perform a denial-of-service attack by adding an SPN that matches an existing service. Additionally, an attacker who can
intercept traffic can impersonate existing services, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and integrity.




According to the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC), the flaw also affects widely used Linux distributions such as Red Hat, SUSE Linux, and Ubuntu.

The vulnerability, rated 9.9 on the CVSS scale, has been credited to security researcher Orange Tsai from DEVCORE, who last year disclosed the widely-exploited flaws in Microsoft Exchange Server. Additionally, the fix has been issued in Samba versions 4.14.12 and 4.15.5.



Samba administrators are advised to upgrade to the latest releases (4.13.17, 4.14.12, and 4.15.5) or apply a patch as soon as possible. Mitigation short of patching would involve changing Samba configuration files so that the vulnerable vfs_fruit module doesn’t run. “The specific flaw exists within the parsing of EA metadata when opening files in SMBD,” an advisory on the flaw from developers of Samba explains.

The ability to write access to extended file attributes is needed in order to attack the flaw, but such permissions are granted to guest or unauthenticated users.

Also addressed by Samba are two additional flaws —

• CVE-2021-44141 (CVSS score: 4.2) - Information leak via symlinks of existence of files or directories outside of the exported share (Fixed in Samba version 4.15.5)
  

• CVE-2022-0336 (CVSS score: 3.1) - Samba AD users with permission to write to an account can impersonate arbitrary services (Fixed in Samba versions 4.13.17, 4.14.12, and 4.15.4)

Samba administrators are recommended to upgrade to these releases or apply the patch as soon as possible to mitigate the defect and thwart any potential attacks exploiting the vulnerability

Disclaimer

 

All tutorials are for informational and educational purposes only and have been made using our own routers, servers, websites and other vulnerable free resources. we do not contain any illegal activity. We believe that ethical hacking, information security and cyber security should be familiar subjects to anyone using digital information and computers. Hacking Truth is against misuse of the information and we strongly suggest against it. Please regard the word hacking as ethical hacking or penetration testing every time this word is used. We do not promote, encourage, support or excite any illegal activity or hacking.